Mitchell Krueger vs Quinn Vandecasteele Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Krueger vs Q. Vandecasteele

Mitchell Krueger

USA

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

202

C. Rank

667

135

Best Rank

555

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Quinn Vandecasteele

USA

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

202

C. Rank

667

135

Best Rank

555

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Krueger 0 - 1 Vandecasteele

They have played 3 sets in total, with Mitchell Krueger winning 1 and Quinn Vandecasteele winning 2. The last match between Quinn Vandecasteele and Mitchell Krueger was at the Cleveland Challenger, 01-02-2024, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Quinn Vandecasteele getting the victory 6-4 6-7(7) 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Krueger	0
Vandecasteele	1

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Cleveland Challenger(02-01-24)

Stats

Quinn Vandecasteele

Mitchell Krueger

M. Krueger vs Q. Vandecasteele H2H Profile

M. Krueger	Stats	Q. Vandecasteele
$1,082,108	Career Prize Money	$0
52.62% (452-407)	Career Total W/L	52.78% (95-85)
0	Indoor	1
10	Titles	1
0	Total H2H Matches	1
25.00% (1-3)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Krueger vs Q. Vandecasteele Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mitchell Krueger has won 46.43% of points on their second serve, while Quinn Vandecasteele has won 45.19%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mitchell Krueger, in recent form, has won 45.89% of their opponent's second serve points, while Quinn Vandecasteele has won 46.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.83% and 26.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mitchell Krueger has saved 58.50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Quinn Vandecasteele has saved 57.66% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mitchell Krueger has won 47.54% of matches played (W/L 29/32), with Quinn Vandecasteele winning 50.77% (W/L 33/32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mitchell Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 124/97), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 10/18). Quinn Vandecasteele has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 2/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 30% (W/L 3/7).
Player level: In the last year, Mitchell Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.26% of matches (W/L 21/17), where as Quinn Vandecasteele has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.78% of matches (W/L 19/17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mitchell Krueger winning 0 times and Quinn Vandecasteele being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mitchell Krueger winning 1 and Quinn Vandecasteele winning 2.
The last match between Mitchell Krueger and Quinn Vandecasteele was at the Cleveland Challenger, 01-02-2024, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Quinn Vandecasteele getting the victory 6-4 6-7(7) 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:50:48.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mitchell Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 217.18 while Quinn Vandecasteele has played against players with an average rank of 412.31.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mitchell Krueger has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Quinn Vandecasteele has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mitchell Krueger has converted 31.21% of breakpoint opportunities, and Quinn Vandecasteele has converted 34.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mitchell Krueger vs Quinn Vandecasteele Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Krueger vs Q. Vandecasteele H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Krueger	Stats	Q. Vandecasteele
0	H2H Matches Won	1
1	Sets Won	2
16	Games Won	19
1	Aces (Total)	12
1	Total Double Faults	7
2:50:48	Average Match Time	2:50:48
65% (85/131)	1st Serve %	50% (53/106)
62% (53/85)	1st Serve Win %	79% (42/53)
50% (23/46)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (23/53)
50% (4/8)	Break Pts Won %	32% (6/19)
39% (41/106)	Return Points Win %	42% (55/131)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Krueger Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Champaign Challenger - 10-11-2025
R1 Darwin BlanchD. Blanch	L	6-3 7-6(5)	Stats
Knoxville Challenger - 03-11-2025
F Darwin BlanchD. Blanch	W	6-7(2) 6-4 6-1	Stats
SF Cedrik-Marcel StebeC. Stebe	W	6-4 6-1	Stats
QF Inaki Montes-De La TorreI. Montes-De	W	7-5 6-4	Stats
R2 Antoine GhibaudoA. Ghibaudo	W	6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

Q. Vandecasteele Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Champaign Challenger - 10-11-2025
R1 Kenta MiyoshiK. Miyoshi	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
Q3 Jeremy ZhangJ. Zhang	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
Q1 Alex KobeltA. Kobelt	W	4-6 6-3 6-2	Stats
Knoxville Challenger - 03-11-2025
Q3 Dhakshineswar SureshD. Suresh	L	7-5 3-6 6-3	Stats
Q1 Noah SchachterN. Schachter	W	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

M. Krueger vs Q. Vandecasteele Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Krueger	Stats	Q. Vandecasteele
52.62% (452/407)	YTD Win/Loss	52.78% (95/85)
52.67% (1067/959)	Sets Win/Loss	52.40% (218/198)
51.10% (9910/9485)	Games Win/Loss	51.63% (2063/1933)
53.56% (278/241)	Hard Win/Loss	57.04% (77/58)
56.11% (124/97)	Clay Win/Loss	30.00% (3/7)
43.96% (40/51)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.63% (13/19)
35.71% (10/18)	Grass Win/Loss	66.67% (2/1)
0.32	Aces Per Game	0.37
3016	Aces Total	720
0.18	Double Faults Per Game	0.29
1732	Total Double Faults	558
1:24:12	Average Match Time	1:22:41
197.22	Average Opponent Rank	386.31
62% (31103/50222)	1st Serve %	54% (5451/10136)
69% (21515/31103)	1st Serve Win %	69% (3745/5451)
51% (9698/19119)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (2213/4697)
41% (1884/4584)	Break Points Won % (Total)	42% (467/1100)
38% (19471/50786)	Return Points Win %	42% (4203/9994)
46.03% (29/34)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/1)
36.36% (12/21)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
48.00% (36/39)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
49.70% (248/251)	Challenger W/L	43.75% (28/36)
67.20% (127/62)	Futures W/L	58.26% (67/48)
52% (441/842)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	51% (89/174)
55% (6/11)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
45% (134/295)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (20/39)
45% (136/299)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (27/60)
81% (459/374)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (97/81)
19% (459/85)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (97/16)
19% (400/74)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (83/13)